Can Google be justified in disregarding older content?

Is the age of content important when it comes to reading a “how to knit” guide? It’s difficult to say whether the content’s age matters without considering whether techniques, theories, and technology have changed in knitting since 2003. Old websites from the late 90s to early 00s have unique designs that may seem odd by today’s standards, but their contents are still relevant and of interest. While newer content in categories like technology, photography, and design may be seen as more relevant, older content, particularly in areas like camping, hiking, and fishing, can still be interesting and useful.

Older content and older websites should be treated differently from modern content. A forum or website that hasn’t been active for 12 years may still have valuable information and content. Such websites are a part of web history and should not be ignored or hidden. While SEO-driven content may rank higher in search results, Google can still recognize and reward quality work. However, it’s possible that older posts and websites are not structured for SEO, which could explain why they may not appear in search results.

Overall, the age of content may or may not be important, depending on the subject matter and how much it has changed over time. However, it’s essential not to disregard older websites and their content, as they are a part of web history and may still contain valuable information.